tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10861841.post2846264526936742022..comments2024-03-17T11:25:47.653+00:00Comments on the-ad-pit: Does Internet Browsing Still Exist?Rob Mortimer (aka Famous Rob)http://www.blogger.com/profile/10070962082242558718noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10861841.post-89947959340869973962010-11-13T10:09:42.158+00:002010-11-13T10:09:42.158+00:00I agree, usage has truly changed. Not to get techn...I agree, usage has truly changed. Not to get technical and all teacher here... but the internet should be separated from the web (www). Only a part of the internet is www. But anyway. There's a Forrester article called "The Splinternet" about how it's fragmenting and at the same time most of all traffic is around very few sources as you say. Facebook, if you've liked many groups/pages, is essentially a big fat RSS reader.Ollehttp://www.funnyyoushouldask.biz/blognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10861841.post-11573763883300524842010-11-11T09:28:06.275+00:002010-11-11T09:28:06.275+00:00In your TV analogy, why flick through channels whe...In your TV analogy, why flick through channels when you can flick through a guide?<br /><br />On the Internet, why browse randomly when you can see a recommendation or a filter (facebook, twitter). <br /><br />You're actually saving time and not getting bogged down in detail. <br /><br />You can still flick. It just takes you less time (although, by the way, I don't know about you, but I still get lost for minutes/hours looking at random stuff). <br /><br />Random flicking is alive and kicking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com